Profile

“Effective as an advocate and good at explaining ideas to the court.”  “He has a real eye for detail, and is incredibly approachable and friendly as well.” (Chambers and Partners 2017)

Appointed Queens’ Counsel in 2014, Jonathan is ranked in Chambers and Partners 2017 in Administrative and Public Law, and POCA Work and Asset Forfeiture. He has a wealth of experience handling unusual, sensitive or controversial matters, especially in the fields of asset recovery, mutual legal assistance, national security, human rights, confiscation, tax and duties, law enforcement, extradition, inquests and immigration, and wherever criminal law interfaces with public law. Before taking Silk, Jonathan was a grade 4 prosecutor.

“Hall is an established player who is well beyond his year of silk in terms of his gravitas and the cases he deals with.” “He’s really clever, he writes well and he’s a great advocate.” “A powerful advocate who can see both sides of an argument and really fine-tune his approach.”

Chambers and Partners 2017

In recent years he has acted in high profile cases such as the ongoing Undercover Policing Inquiry, the recovery of assets stolen by General Abacha, the 7/7 Brecon Beacon and Litvinenko Inquests, civil claims arising out of the shooting of Mark Duggan, and damages claims against the intelligence services.

Jonathan is familiar with the demands of large organisations and the strategic implications of litigation and investigations, and is frequently instructed to advise private clients and public bodies on issues of RIPA, cybercrime and data protection, law enforcement, regulatory crime, national security and on novel and difficult issues of fact and law.

Recognition

Badge-27@2x_new Badge 20@2x

Expertise

Recent cases

Hide Show
  • Undercover Policing Inquiry, representing the Metropolitan Police Service before Sir Christopher Pitchford, ongoing (https://www.ucpi.org.uk)
  • National Crime Agency v Abacha Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Times, September 29, 2016 (disclosure of Letters of Request)
  • MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 32 (reference by Supreme Court to EJC on immigration/EU issue)
  • A v DPP, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), [2016] EWCA Crim 96 (restraint proceedings under POCA against foreign nationals)
  • R (on the application of McKenzie) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2016] 1 W.L.R. 1308 (protection of LPP material using information technology)
  • B v Chief Constable of Northern Ireland [2016] Crim. L.R. 428 (police powers of arrest relating to Bloody Sunday)
  • National Crime Agency v Abacha, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), 21 January 2015 [2015] EWHC 357 (Admin); [2015] Lloyd’s Rep. F.C. 411 (new statutory freezing power to recover assets stolen by former Nigerian dictator)
  • Yam v Attorney General, Supreme Court, [2016] A.C. 771 (power to prevent transmission of detail sensitive court proceedings to European Court of Human Rights)
  • Sher v United Kingdom, App.No. 5201/11, 20 October 2015 (Prevention of terrorism; warrants of detention; search warrants).
  • Beghal v DPP, Supreme Court, 22 July 2015 [2015] 3 W.L.R. 344 (Investigatory powers; Privilege against self-incrimination; Proportionality; Right to fair trial; Right to liberty and security; Right to respect for private and family life; Terrorism)
  • The Brecon Inquests (deaths of 3 reservists from heat illness), June 2015
  • Amin v DG of MI5 and others [2015] EWCA Civ 653 (strike out; damages complicity in torture)
  • DD v Secretary of State for Home Department [2015] EWHC 1681 (Admin) (terror suspect/ Art 3)
  • TN and MA v Secretary of State for Home Department [2015] 1 WLR 3083 (Supreme Court, asylum claims by Afghan children)
  • National Iranian Tanker Co v Foreign Secretary [2015] EWHC 282 (Admin) (injunction in EU sanctions case)
  • Magee and Others v the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, judgment 12 May 2015
  • Armstrong v the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, judgment 9 December 2014
  • NCA v Surin: Civil recovery claim against notorious criminal.
  • Martin-Artajo v FCA:Representing former banker in claim arising out of the ‘London Whale’ JP Morgan trades.
  • Duggan v Metropolitan Police: Acting for Met Police in civil claims arising from shooting of Mark Duggan.

Appointments

Hide Show
  • Queen’s Counsel (2014)
  • Recorder of the Crown Court

Education

Hide Show

University of Oxford, BA (Hons), English Language and Literature

Languages

Hide Show
  • French (Advanced)

Notable cases

Show more

Duggan v Metropolitan Police

Acting for the Metropolitan Police in civil clams arising from the shooting of Mark Duggan.

Armstrong v United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights, judgment 9 December 2014.

NCA v Surin

Civil recovery claim against notorious criminal.

Magee and Others v United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights, judgment 12 May 2015

TN and MA v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Supreme Court matter concerning asylum claims by Afghan children.

Amin v DG of MI5 and Others

Concerning strike out and damages complicity in torture.

The Brecon Inquests

Inquest into the deaths of three reservists from heat illness.

Sher v United Kingdom

Concerning prevention of terrorism, warrants of detention and search warrants.

National Crime Agency v Abacha

Concerning a new statutory freezing power to recover assets stolen by a former Nigerian dictator.

Undercover Policing Inquiry

The Inquiry into undercover police operations conducted by English and Welsh police forces in England and Wales since 1968, chaired by Lord Justice Christopher Pitchford.

DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Whether the imposition of a terrorism measure on person suffering mental illness contravenes Art.3 ECHR

Yam v Attorney General

Whether an order preventing publication of material heard in private in a murder trial, for national security reasons, extended to an application by the offender to the European Court of Human Rights...

Martin-Artajo v Financial Conduct Authority

Representing a former banker in a claim arising out of the “London Whale” JP Morgan trades (Upper Tribunal, 2014)

Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions

The leading domestic case on the compatibility of detention and questioning at airports under the Terrorism Act 2000 with Articles 5, 6 and 8 of the Convention (Concerned investigatory powers,...

Related news

Show more
17 February

Top 10 set for Supreme Court appearances in 2016

We are delighted to have been recognised by The Lawyer Magazine as one of the top 10 sets in the country in terms of frequency of appearances before the Supreme Court in 2016. Seven of our members...

10 March

New Cybercrime Group

The Cybercrime Practitioners Association held its launch last week at Portcullis House. Jonathan Hall QC spoke at the launch, and is quoted in today's Times Law Section on some of the key...

7 December

Court of Appeal hears asset recovery challenge

In a judgment handed down on 3 December 2015 in Satnam v National Crime Agency, the Court of Appeal (the Chancellor, Patten and Christopher Clarke LJJ) rejected a challenge brought by the (innocent)...

14 July

The Brecon Inquests

Jonathan Hall QC and Ben Lloyd appeared for the Ministry of Defence in the inquest into the death of three army reservists from heat illness during a march across the Brecon Beacons. The inquest...

18 May

6KBW College Hill Cybercrime Seminar

On 14 May 2015, Chambers hosted a seminar focusing on Cybercrime. The panel discussion was chaired by Jonathan Hall QC and the Q&A was chaired Law Commissioner, Professor David Ormerod QC....

8 May

Will Hays appointed to Attorney General's C-Panel

Will Hays appointed to Attorney General's C-Panel Chambers is pleased to announce that the Attorney General has appointed Will Hays to the C-Panel for civil and EU work. Four members of chambers...